Jesus H Christ, I've had a eureka moment.....
It has taken me a long time just to admit I want to be in a relationship. Now that I have made THAT admission, I think it may be worse. I think I may need to be in a loving relationship before I should have sex.
Should is the very important, operative word in that sentenct. For one thing, I'm not sure I'm capable of such behavior. I mean, for fuck's sake, I am at my sexual peak, like an 18 year-old boy. I am supposed to be married and able to get it whenever I want it, right? How in the hell am I supposed to WAIT? And why? It's not like I'm doing something I've never done before.
But here's the rub. It doesn't matter why. Something has changed. I feel shittier and shittier having sex and then not being treated the way I'd like to be treated, but how in the hell are these poor dupes supposed to know how I'd like to be treated when, in fact, we don't know each other. I'd like to think I can just get up and be all, Well, that was fun. Next! But the evidence mounts. I am doing the same thing and expecting different results.
But do I need to go all the way with this? Do I need to be loved before I can have sex? Does anything less just lead to heartache? Should I, by my own reasoning and the state of my own romantic life, still be a virgin?
I fear never having sex again. Sometimes I can admit to myself--progress?--it's not the lack of sex I truly fear.
Maybe if I'd taken this approach from the start I'd be happily married with 1.2 kids.
But how do you know what love is without sex? I have loads of loving relationships in my life--these are not people I orgasm with. I don't know if I'm capable of loving someone until I've rooted around in their smell. Is it not splitting hairs to do everything BUT fuck and pretend you did not have sexual relations?
So much for my eureka. This is still a pigfuck. I want a clear answer but I don't think it's strapping on the chastity belt. The answer lies somewhere in the middle. Yawn.
Labels: chastity belt